Review



virus recovery data for flub  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC virus recovery data for flub
    Virus Recovery Data For Flub, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/virus+recovery+data+for+flub/Influenza+B+virus/10__3390_slash_pharmaceutics17030349-232-217-222
    Average 99 stars, based on 16 article reviews
    virus recovery data for flub - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Neutralization:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Biomarker Discovery:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Control:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Formulation:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Virus:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Activity Assay:

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1 , Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.

    Article Title: In Vitro Development of Local Antiviral Formulations with Potent Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Viruses
    Article Snippet: Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030349/s1, Figure S1: Physical characteristics (turbid or clear) of formulations containing DLM and surfactant at different ratios, measured 1 day after preparation and after a temperature cycling test (6 cycles); Table S1: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in MDCK cells; Table S2: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in MDCK cells; Table S3: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S4: Virus recovery data for FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S5: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S6: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H1N1pdm) (A/Thailand/104/2009); Table S7: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S8: Virus recovery data for FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S9: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S10: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluA(H3N2) (ATCC VR-1881TM); Table S11: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S12: Virus recovery data for FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S13: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S14: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against FluB (ATCC VR-1735TM); Table S15: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for oral formulation D in Vero cells; Table S16: Cytotoxicity and neutralization validation control data for nasal formulation E in Vero cells; Table S17: Test results for oral formulation D and nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S18: Virus recovery data for SARS-CoV-2; Table S19: Virucidal activity of oral formulation D at ±a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2; Table S20: Virucidal activity of nasal formulation E at a dilution of 1:32 against SARS-CoV-2.



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC virus recovery data for flub
    Virus Recovery Data For Flub, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/virus+recovery+data+for+flub/Influenza+B+virus/10__3390_slash_pharmaceutics17030349-232-217-222
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    virus recovery data for flub - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results